In your own previous post you asserted you didn't need anything to have freedom of speech; now you say it requires Internet access? Real clear stream of logic, there, bucko.
Nice dodge of the question at hand, BTW.
Should people who can't pay for medical care be turfed out to fend for themselves? This is right by your worldview? Yes/no?
Nice dodge of the question at hand, BTW.
Should people who can't pay for medical care be turfed out to fend for themselves? This is right by your worldview? Yes/no?