Posts: 2,238
Threads: 136
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
Some politicians are charming, and others are just outright strange.
-----
Stand between the Silver Crystal and the Golden Sea.
"Youngsters these days just have no appreciation for the magnificence of the legendary cucumber." --Krityan Elder, Tales of Vesperia.
Posts: 4,917
Threads: 196
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
2
Speaking of 'Glad I don't live there' -- Canada's new 'internet safety' bill gives me the willies.
Quote:Among other things, the bill requires ISPs to install surveillance technology and software to enable monitoring of phone and internet traffic. Section 34 is there to make sure ISPs comply. So what, exactly, does it say?
Essentially, it says that government agents may enter an ISP when they wish, without a warrant, and demand to see absolutely everything — including all data anywhere on the network — and to copy it all. If that seems hard to believe, let's walk through it.
First, Section 33 tells us that, "The Minister may designate persons or classes of persons as inspectors for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of this Act." So we're not talking about police officers necessarily. We're talking about anyone the minister chooses — or any class of persons. (Musicians? Left-handed hockey players? Members of the Conservative Party? Sure, that's absurd — but the bill allows it...)
Next, Section 34 spells out the sweeping powers of these "inspectors." And, if they sound Orwellian, welcome to the world of Section 34.
The inspectors may "enter any place owned by, or under the control of, any telecommunications service provider in which the inspector has reasonable grounds to believe there is any document, information, transmission apparatus, telecommunications facility or any other thing to which this Act applies."
And, once he or she is in, anything goes.
The inspector, says the bill, may "examine any document, information or thing found in the place and open or cause to be opened any container or other thing." He or she may also "use, or cause to be used, any computer system in the place to search and examine any information contained in or available to the system."
You read that right. The inspector gets to see "any" information that's in or "available to the system." Yours, mine, and everyone else's emails, phone calls, web surfing, shopping, you name it. But, if that sounds breath-taking enough, don't quit now because the section is still not done.
The inspector — remember, this is anyone the minister chooses — is also empowered to copy anything that strikes his or her fancy. The inspector may "reproduce, or cause to be reproduced, any information in the form of a printout, or other intelligible output, and remove the printout, or other output, for examination or copying."
Oh, and he can even use the ISP's own computers and connections to copy it or to email it to himself. He can "use, or cause to be used, any copying equipment or means of telecommunication at the place."
In short, there's nothing the inspector cannot see or copy. "Any" information is up for grabs. And you thought the new airport body scanners were intrusive?
Finally, note that such all-encompassing searches require no warrant, and don't even have to be in the context of a criminal investigation. Ostensibly, the purpose is to ensure that the ISP is complying with the requirements of the act — but nothing in the section restricts the inspector to examining or seizing only information bearing upon that issue. It's still "any" information whatsoever.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2 ... l-c30.html
--
Sucrose Octanitrate.
Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode.
Posts: 24,924
Threads: 2,045
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
12
Looks like Terry Milewski didn't actually read the bill.
But I'm not surprised. The CBC and the Conservatives have never gotten along...
(Not that I'm saying C-30 is all sweetness and light - it isn't, and it isn't needed. But it's nowhere near as bad as the CBC makes it out to be.)
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Posts: 400
Threads: 66
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
1
Tell me there are checks and the like to make sure that the people in charge aren't high or doing drugs when they draft these silly things ... because I really really want to know what some people are smoking.
Posts: 4,917
Threads: 196
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
2
Theoretically. It's called "Electing someone else".
--
Sucrose Octanitrate.
Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode.
Posts: 400
Threads: 66
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
1
There's only one problem (only one? Try many!) with the recent series of events... they have only brought light on part of the problems that are systemic. And people will forget.
Another issue is ... over there is quickly becoming over here. I don't know if this is purely fear-mongering or where exactly the bias is of this article but... DAMN: Verisign seizes .com domain registered via foreign Registrar on behalf of US Authorities. Basically its how a gambling site got shut down. One the one hand, yay! Shut down gambling. I know that every time I get a spam email invite saying come to this new wiz bang online casino, some one somewhere is breaking Aussie law. On the other hand... let me go get my tinfoil cap on. The whole net is at risk, as pointed out in the article.
And then there is this little article: Twitter gives Boston police, prosecutors data from one subscriber in criminal inquiry. ... What ever happened to Freedom of Speech? Twitter is a global medium and basically a billboard where you shout to the world.
Fun and games.
|
